Svenska
Blog

Bourne Legacy = Medioker?

Skrivet av Petter den 10 augusti 2012 kl 11:57

Recensionerna har varit svala. Tråkigt. Jag trodde verkligen att Bourne Legacy skulle hålla Bourne Identity-klass. Eller jag hade i alla fall hoppats. Så verkar det dock inte ligga till så en samlad amerikansk kritikerkår smaskat dit medelbetyg på filmen. Jag har läst igenom några av recensionerna.

The Boston Globe (6/10)
The best thing that can be said about The Bourne Legacy is that Renner will survive it.

Chicago Sun-Times (6/10)
The Bourne Legacy is always gripping in the moment. The problem is in getting the moments to add up.

Hollywood Reporter (5/10)
The same tone and look are maintained, but the visceral excitement is muffled by familiarity, an insufficiently conceived lead character and the sheer weight of backstory and multiple layers of deception.

Time Magazine (5/10)
The overall tone is familiar, refried, redundant.

San Francisco Chronicle (3/10)
The Bourne series ended with the last installment, and now comes a 135-minute death rattle called The Bourne Legacy. It's a peculiar movie, both over-plotted and under-plotted, encumbered by layers of detail and yet with no details invested in or developed.

Bourne Legacy = Medioker?

Aaron: "Vaddå 5/10? Jag har ju två pistoler. Kolla!"

HQ