Svenska
Blog

Hangover III är horribel (?)

Skrivet av Petter den 24 maj 2013 kl 10:50

Jag tippade inte på några chockhöga betyg direkt, detta då Hangover II faktiskt var en av tidernas sämsta filmer. Men jag trodde nig att trean skulle bli lite bättre, i alla fall. När de amerikanska betygen nu trillar in är de skrämmande låga och recensenterna verkar direkt provocerade av den koncentrerade uselhet som här tydligen erbjuds. Såhär låter det nämligen:

The New York Times (1/10)
The Hangover Part III, directed by Todd Phillips from a screenplay he wrote with Craig Mazin, is a dull, lazy walkthrough that along with "The Big Wedding" has a claim to be the year's worst star-driven movie.

The New York Post (1/10)
The good news is that The Hangover Part III isn't a rerun like the second episode. The bad news is everything else.

Los Angeles Times (2/10)
Chow is actually an apt metaphor for the movie - indescribably irritating and only in it for the money.

San Francisco Chronicle (2/10)
This is a joyless, unfunny mix of comedy and drama, a complete waste of time, with exactly one good joke in the entire movie. It comes in the first minute. After that, you can leave.

Miami Herald (3/10)
Theres exactly one good scene in all of The Hangover Part III, a hilarious bit of business halfway during the end credits that reminds you what made the original film so good.

Hangover III är horribel (?)

Även innan de rekordlåga betygen var mina förväntningar superlåga. Detta eftersom tvåan var avskyvärd.

HQ